Differences Between Settlements & Verdicts

by | Jun 24, 2021 | Personal Injury | 0 comments

When an individual sustains injuries as the result of property or landowner negligence, they may be able to file a personal injury claim against the individual party or company involved, depending on the circumstances of the injuries. 

Personal injury claims can be resolved inside or outside a courtroom and are awarded through a settlement or verdict. The difference between a settlement and a verdict comes down to who gets to make the final decision of the case.  


In personal injury cases, verdicts are the result of someone else, other than the involved parties, making the decision on what should be awarded. The final result of a court proceeding, verdicts are either decided on by a jury, referred to as a jury verdict, or by a judge which is referred to as a bench verdict. 

These types of verdicts typically occur because the involved parties cannot agree on an appropriate settlement and the matter goes to trial where the courts will decide the case. The disadvantage of a trial verdict versus a settlement is that if either party is not happy about the decision that was made, there is the potential for an appeal. 

This, however, would result in more time spent waiting while the claim or lawsuit continues to move through the legal processes. Eventually, once a case reaches a certain level in the court system, the decision will be final, but getting through all the levels of court can take a considerable amount of time and the parties involved would have to decide if they want to pay for that time, or agree on the original verdict.


Settlements are considered a voluntary but binding agreement that two parties have entered into and typically take place outside of the court system. If at any time during a personal injury case both sides agree to the compensation being offered then a settlement has been reached. 

Settlements are cleaner than trial verdicts because it means that all the parties have agreed together on what fair compensation would be. Typically, settlements are reached before a lawsuit is filed. There are cases, however, where the parties involved will finally reach and agree to a settlement offer after a lawsuit has been filed. 

Is One More Favorable to the Other?

There are advantages and disadvantages to settlements and verdicts, most of which depend on the nature of each individual case. Here are a few of the benefits and drawbacks you might find with each. The route a personal injury claim should take is best determined on a case-by-case basis in conjunction with your attorney. 

Settlement Pros: 

  • The settlement process can be resolved more quickly than going to court.
  • You have more control over the decisions being made during a settlement as opposed to taking your claim to trial where you have no control over the final outcome. 
  • You know exactly how much compensation you will receive because it was negotiated by both parties.
  • The cost of attorney fees will be less because you did not take the claim to court. 


Settlement Cons:

  • The decision is considered permanent. Once a settlement has been made you cannot renegotiate for a better deal later on. 
  • You may receive a lower settlement amount than what you could be awarded from a jury verdict. 
  • Settlements are confidential which means you will not be able to discuss or share anything with the public.  


Verdict Pros:

  • You have the potential for a greater settlement out of a jury or judge verdict. 
  • The trial is a public record so you can talk about it. 


Verdict Cons:

  • Trials are long and can often be drawn out for longer than a year, delaying how quickly you could receive compensation.  
  • Verdicts are unpredictable and there is the possibility that you won’t receive anything after a trial verdict. 
  • Trials are public, which means that all matters of the trial are open to the public and you don’t have any privacy regarding the case. 


If you have questions about which route is best for you and your claim and you don’t have an attorney, or your attorney is not answering your questions, we would encourage you to reach out to us and one of our experienced personal injury attorneys can help you decide which route is best for you. 

Discuss Your Case with an Experienced Attorney today 

While it’s far more common for a personal injury case to settle than go to trial, the attorneys at Johnson | Livingston will advocate on your behalf and make sure you receive fair and just compensation no matter the route your case takes. 

If your insurance company is offering you a settlement, and you have not discussed the case with an attorney, that is even more reason to review the case with someone who understands the laws, and your rights. While settlements are important to the claims process often times insurance companies will offer a low settlement to stop you from pursuing a claim or case. We have had many clients who were offered settlements prematurely without knowing the extent of their injuries or their rights, and we helped them to get what they needed to fully address their injury. 

See our Case Studies Here > 

Determining the path your personal injury case should take is not a decision that should be made alone. Don’t take a settlement prematurely or without the advice of a personal injury attorney. 

Schedule your free consultation today with one of the experienced attorneys at Johnson | Livingston.  Give us a call now at (801) 948-9670 or request more information here.


Submit a Comment